The overwhelming majority of Americans are opposed to the war and occupation in Iraq; concerned that its eventual two trillion-dollar price tag robs money from pressing domestic needs; and alarmed at the idea of waging future wars for oil. In addition millions of voters are appalled that the annual $700 billion U.S. military budget represents 50% of the total federal discretionary spending and is equal to the combined military spending of every nation in the world.
Comment:
Question 1A
Do you support a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. military forces and armed private contractors from Iraq & Afghanistan (within 120 days), the full restoration of national control over their natural resources, including oil, and a redirection of war funding to social and environmental needs at home, as well as humanitarian and reconstruction aid to the Iraqi & Afghan people? On the local and state level, do you support Afghanistan & Iraq Peace Resolutions?
Yes
Comment:
Question 1B
Do you support a dismantling of all U.S. military bases in the region?
Yes
Comment:
Question 1C
Do you support stepped up diplomacy with Iran, coupled with a "no war" pledge? On the local and state level, do you support No War with Iran Resolutions?
Yes
Comment:
Question 1D
Do you support a peaceful resolution of the Israel-Palestine conflict, guaranteeing Israelis security and justice for Palestinians?
Yes
Comment:
Question 1E
Would you support an immediate 50% reduction of U.S. military spending and a transfer of these funds to pressing domestic needs? On the local and state level, do you support Bring the Money Home Now Resolutions?
Yes
Comment:
Question 1F
Do you support the current articles of impeachment in the U.S.Congress
charging President George Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney with high
crimes and misdemeanors for illegally provoking the war in Iraq and
threatening to start a war with Iran?? On the local and state level, do you support Impeachment Resolutions?
Yes
Comment:
Question 1G
Do you support the full restoration of our Constitutional liberties, including an end to warrantless wiretapping and an immediate repeal of the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, and the Detainee Treatment Act? On the local and state level, do you support Bill of Rights Defense Committee Resolutions?
Yes
Comment:
Question 1H
Given that millions of Americans, 42% according to a May 2006 Zogby International poll, believe that the U.S. government and the 9/11 Commission "concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence that contradicts their official explanation of the September 11th attacks," and that "there has been a cover-up," do you support a full release of all evidence, and a new, truly independent investigation of all the events of September 11, 2001, as well as the suspicious anthrax terrorist attacks that followed 9/11, with subpoenaed witnesses forced to testify under oath? On the local and state level, do you support resolutions and ballot initiatives like the NYC 911 Ballot Initiative?
Millions of Americans are alarmed by the prospect of our current
climate crisis turning in to a full-blown climate catastrophe, and support
the idea of a massive Green New Deal to conserve energy, make the transition
to clean renewable energy, create millions of "green collar" jobs, and
drastically reduce climate-destabilizing greenhouse pollution from our
current, and rising, 387 parts per million (ppm) to a level back below the
dangerous tipping point of 350 parts per million (ppm) of atmospheric CO2.
Comment:
Question 2A
Do you support an immediate and ongoing crash program, comparable in scale and urgency to the Marshal Plan after World War II, to convert the U.S. economy to clean energy, implement major energy conservation measures, and transfer clean energy technologies to other major greenhouse gas producing nations, so as to drastically reduce global greenhouse gas emissions? Specifically would you support a legislative package requiring an immediate freeze on climate pollution, a 10% reduction in U.S. greenhouse gases within three years, a 30% reduction by 2020, and a 90% reduction by 2050; coupled with a requirement that 50% of all industrial, farm, and home energy be generated from renewable sources by 2040?
Yes
Comment:
Question 2B
Would you support an international currency or capital transfer/transactions
tax (often called a "Tobin tax"), a carbon tax, and an
international air travel tax to finance the transfer of hundreds
of billions of dollars of green energy technologies to India, China,
Mexico, Nigeria and other major greenhouse gas producing nations?
Yes
Comment:
Question 2C
Do you support a U.S. energy sustainability program that would withdraw $40 billion in annual subsidies from fossil fuels and establish equivalent subsidies for clean energy sources?
Yes
Comment:
Question 2D
Would you support the conversion of 20% of U.S. farmland to energy-efficient and carbon-sequestering organic farming by 2020 and 50% by 2040, with at least 5-10% of the USDAs annual $90 billion budget immediately being targeted to rebuild local food systems and help farmers make the transition to organic?
Yes
Comment:
Question 2E
Would you support a ban on unsustainable logging on U.S. public lands and in tropical rainforests, a restoration of carbon sequestering wetlands and forests, and the reintroduction of eco-friendly industrial hemp farming?
Yes
Comment:
Question 2F
Do you support a law requiring American cars to get at least 50 miles to the gallon by 2020 and a moratorium on all new coal and nuclear plants?
Yes
Comment:
Question 2G
Would you support the creation of five million new "Green Collar" jobs,
with a special emphasis on training and providing jobs for inner-city
youth and veterans, to retrofit the nations homes and buildings
and conserve 20% of our energy use by 2015?
Preventive health care, natural medicine, and proper nutrition have been linked to a broad range of health and social benefits, including disease reduction, increased academic performance, and lower health care costs. Unfortunately, a large percentage of the U.S. population lacks access to health care, complimentary medicine, and healthy foods. A major solution to this unacceptable situation is to shift to a single-payer, publicly financed, prevention-based, universal health care system. The $350 billion in savings that would occur by eliminating the profit motive and moving to a single-payer system would allow us to insure and promote the health and wellness of our entire population.
In addition, scientific evidence is mounting that Americans' daily exposure to 100,000 different synthetic chemicals (less than 10% of which have ever been safety tested) in our food, water, medicines, body care products, cosmetics, toys, home environments, etc. are undermining our health and creating an epidemic of debilitating and deadly diseases including cancer, heart disease, asthma, allergies, and chemical sensitivities.
The federal government currently censors the dissemination of important scientific research information. For example, food producers and dietary supplement makers are banned from citing scientific research on the health benefits of natural and organic foods, herbs, and vitamins.
Currently, six states have passed "health freedom" legislation (California, Idaho, Louisiana, Minnesota, Oklahoma, and Rhode Island), providing guidelines and making it legal for alternative/integrative medicine practitioners to practice their profession without fear of prosecution.
Comment:
Question 3A
Do you support a cost-efficient, publicly-funded, universal health care program with a preventive focus, a major emphasis on better nutrition, physical exercise, stress reduction, reduced exposure to toxins, and the use of complementary, natural medicine and practices? Do you support state and local action on health care, including and state and local laws to cover the uninsured?
Yes
Comment:
Question 3B
Would you endorse the "precautionary principle" as a foundation for public health, environmental, and consumer safety legislation, such as the recent "REACH" legislation in the European Union?
Yes
Comment:
Question 3C
Do you support "Health Freedom," the right of consumers to choose the type of health care they want and the right of practitioners to practice freely within the scope of their licensure?
Yes
Comment:
Question 3D
Do you support legislation that would protect the first amendment right to cite scientific information on the benefits of organic and natural foods and dietary supplements?
Hundreds of thousands of Americans are in jail for the "crime" of possessing a natural herb, with significant beneficial medicinal properties, marijuana. Many countries have legalized or decriminalized adult marijuana use and possession. More and more Americans believe that drug policy should emphasize treatment over criminalization, not a drug war that erodes Constitutional freedoms, privacy, and law enforcement resources.
Large corporations and wealthy millionaires and billionaires in the United States pay little or no taxes, compared to the more egalitarian democracies of Europe, where universal healthcare, subsidized childcare, and free college tuition are the norm.
Would you support a federal tax plan where a tax of .1% on the purchase of stocks, bonds, securities and currency was coupled with a federal income tax rate where the first $100,000 of income was tax-free?
Yes
Issue #6: Trade, Labor, and Minimum Wage Reform
So-called "Free Trade" agreements like NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA benefit large transnational corporations, but are increasingly unpopular, because they undermine the wages and living conditions of family farmers and workers throughout the world and contribute to environmental degradation and massive immigration by impoverished farmers and workers. Unfair labor laws that discourage workers from collectively bargaining for better wages and working conditions have compounded the damage of these so-called Free Trade agreements.
Would you support federal legislation, such as the Employee Free Choice Act, guaranteeing that when the majority of workers in a corporation, an industrial farm, or a sizeable workplace sign union cards, the employer would be required to enter into a collective bargaining process with the workers?
Do you support immigration reform, to give the nation’s 12 million undocumented immigrants a path to legal status? Do you support legislation that limits enforcement of immigration laws by state and local authorities?
Yes
Issue #7: Status of Corporations
Corporations are not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. They are chartered (licensed) by state governments because it is assumed public benefit can come from offering the privileges of incorporation to private investors. We therefore believe corporations should be subordinate to our democratic processes and that they possess privileges, not inherent rights.
In 1886, however, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a constitutionally unsupported ruling that led to corporations enjoying many protections of our Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment, without the limitations or responsibilities of real persons (i.e. "corporate personhood"). This doctrine has allowed corporations and their directors to corrupt democratic processes, escape accountability for crimes, and prevented citizens from ensuring these creations of the state do not harm citizens.
Comment:
Question 7A
Would you support amendments to federal and state constitutions to revoke the Supreme Court's bestowing of constitutional rights upon corporations?
Only fifty-one percent of eligible voters participated in the last presidential election. Increasing cynicism and concerns over fraudulent elections are infecting our citizenry and undermining the viability of our democracy. In almost all races, the candidate who raises the most money from special interests wins the election. Candidates and elected public officials are forced to spend an inordinate amount of time chasing after campaign dollars, rather than dealing with constituent concerns.
In addition, winner-take-all elections unfairly marginalize independent parties and candidates, and reduce the scope of the debate in election campaigns.
In order to participate fully in our communities' shared social, cultural, and political life, we need a diverse range of media voices and information.
"Net neutrality" requires Internet service providers to give all users of this public commons equal access. AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and other large companies want to turn the information super-highway into a private toll road. The loss of net neutrality would mean that telecom and cable companies could slow down or even cut off access to websites and email in order to increase their profits, or eliminate content that was objectionable to them.
Do you support legislation to prevent Internet companies from rigging the system to serve only the highest-paying users and discriminate against users they don't like?
Yes
Issue #10: Reproductive Freedom and Civil Rights
True democracy gives all people a place at the table. Equal rights, equal opportunity, and affirmative action to correct past and present injustices must be guiding principles of a democratic society, especially in view of historic and ongoing discrimination based on sex, race, national origin, language, immigration status, sexuality, gender, disability, age, religion and political belief. Reproductive freedom is an essential aspect of equality, individual liberty and personal privacy.